9StraightNines

Theme Analysis Sheets

Macbeth — 6 themes · A4 printable

Macbeth presents ambition as a destructive force that, once unleashed, consumes the individual entirely — transforming a loyal warrior into a tyrannical murderer, and ultimately proving that the pursuit of power without moral restraint leads only to isolation, madness, and death.

Ambition

Point 1

Lady Macbeth is the initial catalyst for Macbeth's ambitious action, using manipulation and gender-shaming to override his conscience and propel him toward regicide.

“Look like th'innocent flower, but be the serpent under't” [Lady Macbeth] Act 1, Scene 5

  • The biblical allusion to the serpent in Eden casts Lady Macbeth in a diabolical role — she consciously adopts the methods of evil for the sake of ambition.
  • The imperative mood ('Look... be') reveals Lady Macbeth's dominance as the strategist of Duncan's murder, inverting expected Jacobean gender dynamics.
  • The juxtaposition of 'innocent flower' and 'serpent' encapsulates how ambition requires concealment — the Macbeths must disguise their true intentions behind hospitality.

“Unsex me here, and fill me from the crown to the toe top-full of direst cruelty” [Lady Macbeth] Act 1, Scene 5

  • Lady Macbeth's invocation to the spirits reveals that ambition requires the suppression of natural human qualities — compassion, femininity, and conscience must be discarded.
  • The phrase 'top-full' suggests she wants to be entirely consumed by cruelty, leaving no room for doubt or mercy.
  • Shakespeare suggests that unchecked ambition is fundamentally unnatural — it requires a person to become something other than human.

Point 2

Macbeth recognises the moral horror of his ambition even as he pursues it, revealing a man whose conscience battles his desire for power throughout the play.

“I have no spur to prick the sides of my intent, but only vaulting ambition, which o'erleaps itself” [Macbeth] Act 1, Scene 7

  • The equestrian metaphor of 'vaulting ambition' presents ambition as a rider who jumps too high and falls — foreshadowing Macbeth's inevitable downfall.
  • Macbeth acknowledges that he has no legitimate reason ('spur') to kill Duncan — only raw ambition drives him, exposing the hollowness of his justification.
  • The phrase 'o'erleaps itself' is proleptic: ambition that exceeds natural limits will destroy itself, which is exactly Macbeth's trajectory.

“Stars, hide your fires; let not light see my black and deep desires” [Macbeth] Act 1, Scene 4

  • The imperative addressed to the stars reveals Macbeth's awareness that his ambition is morally 'black' — he already knows his desires are wrong.
  • The personification of light as a moral witness suggests Macbeth fears divine judgement, connecting ambition to the violation of the Great Chain of Being.
  • Shakespeare uses the imagery of darkness to establish that ambition operates in secrecy and shame — it cannot survive exposure to moral scrutiny.

Point 3

After the murder of Duncan, Macbeth's ambition becomes a self-perpetuating cycle of violence — each crime demands another to maintain his grip on power.

“I am in blood stepped in so far that, should I wade no more, returning were as tedious as go o'er” [Macbeth] Act 3, Scene 4

  • The extended metaphor of wading through a river of blood presents murder as a journey with no return — Macbeth is trapped by his own actions.
  • The word 'tedious' is chilling: murder has become not horrifying but merely inconvenient, revealing the atrophy of Macbeth's moral sense.
  • Shakespeare shows that ambition creates a momentum of its own — once the first moral boundary is crossed, each subsequent crime becomes easier.

“To be thus is nothing, but to be safely thus” [Macbeth] Act 3, Scene 1

  • Having achieved the crown, Macbeth discovers that ambition provides no satisfaction — power brings only paranoia and the need to commit further violence.
  • The word 'nothing' is devastating: the thing he murdered for has turned out to be worthless, exposing the fundamental emptiness at the heart of his ambition.
  • This drives the decision to murder Banquo, proving that ambition's appetite is never satisfied — each achievement demands more.

Point 4

Macbeth's final soliloquy reveals the ultimate consequence of unchecked ambition: a nihilistic despair in which life itself has been drained of all meaning and purpose.

“Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow, creeps in this petty pace from day to day” [Macbeth] Act 5, Scene 5

  • The epizeuxis (triple repetition) of 'tomorrow' creates a slow, relentless rhythm that mirrors the monotony of Macbeth's joyless existence after ambition has consumed everything.
  • The verb 'creeps' personifies time as insidious and meaningless — the urgency that once drove Macbeth has collapsed into nihilistic emptiness.
  • Shakespeare shows that ambition's final destination is not power but despair — Macbeth has gained a kingdom and lost his humanity.

“Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage” [Macbeth] Act 5, Scene 5

  • The extended theatrical metaphor reduces all human ambition to empty performance — 'struts' captures arrogance, 'frets' captures anxiety.
  • The culmination — 'a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing' — is Shakespeare's most nihilistic statement, spoken by the man who sacrificed everything for power.
  • The dramatic irony is devastating: Macbeth's ambition has proved the very meaninglessness he now perceives — his pursuit of power was itself 'signifying nothing'.

Macbeth demonstrates that guilt is an inescapable consequence of moral transgression — manifesting as hallucinations, sleeplessness, and psychological disintegration — and that no amount of power or denial can suppress the conscience permanently.

Guilt & Conscience

Point 1

Macbeth's dagger hallucination on the eve of Duncan's murder reveals a mind already fracturing under the weight of what it is about to do, showing that guilt can precede the crime itself.

“Is this a dagger which I see before me, the handle toward my hand?” [Macbeth] Act 2, Scene 1

  • The rhetorical question exposes Macbeth's fractured psyche — he cannot distinguish between reality and hallucination, showing the psychological torment of approaching irreversible evil.
  • The phrasing 'toward my hand' is ambiguous: does the dagger invite him to grasp it or merely point the way? This mirrors Macbeth's uncertainty about fate versus free will.
  • The soliloquy grants the audience access to Macbeth's disintegrating mind — Shakespeare shows that Macbeth is not a cold-blooded killer but a man in genuine psychological anguish.

“Macbeth does murder sleep” [Macbeth (hearing a voice)] Act 2, Scene 2

  • The personification of sleep as something that can be 'murdered' suggests that Macbeth's crime has destroyed his capacity for peace, rest, and innocence.
  • Jacobeans believed sleep was a gift from God — by murdering Duncan, Macbeth has severed himself from divine grace and natural order.
  • The disembodied voice represents Macbeth's conscience speaking truths his conscious mind cannot yet accept, foreshadowing the insomnia and paranoia that will consume him.

Point 2

Immediately after Duncan's murder, Macbeth's overwhelming guilt manifests in the image of blood that cannot be washed away — establishing the play's central motif of indelible moral stain.

“Will all great Neptune's ocean wash this blood clean from my hand?” [Macbeth] Act 2, Scene 2

  • The hyperbolic classical allusion — even the entire ocean cannot cleanse his hands — reveals that Macbeth understands his crime is metaphysical, not merely physical.
  • The devastating scale contrast — vast ocean versus small hand — yet the hand's guilt outweighs the ocean, inverting natural proportions.
  • Macbeth recognises the permanence of guilt immediately, unlike Lady Macbeth, whose delayed recognition will prove even more destructive.

“this my hand will rather the multitudinous seas incarnadine, making the green one red” [Macbeth] Act 2, Scene 2

  • Rather than the sea cleansing Macbeth, Macbeth will stain the sea — guilt is presented as a contaminating force that spreads outward from the individual to corrupt the entire world.
  • The rare Latinate word 'incarnadine' slows the line, forcing the audience to absorb the horror, before the brutal simplicity of 'making the green one red'.
  • Shakespeare uses the blood motif to argue that guilt from moral transgression cannot be contained — it permeates everything the guilty person touches.

Point 3

Lady Macbeth's dismissal of guilt in Act 2 and her total psychological collapse in Act 5 form the play's most devastating ironic reversal, proving that conscience cannot be indefinitely suppressed.

“A little water clears us of this deed” [Lady Macbeth] Act 2, Scene 2

  • Lady Macbeth's dismissive response creates a dramatic contrast with Macbeth's ocean imagery — she believes guilt is a surface stain easily removed.
  • Her inability to see the moral weight of the murder foreshadows her later sleepwalking scene, when the blood she dismissed returns to haunt her.
  • Shakespeare establishes that denial of guilt is not strength but delayed catastrophe — the longer guilt is suppressed, the more devastating its return.

“Out, damned spot! Out, I say!” [Lady Macbeth] Act 5, Scene 1

  • The exclamatory imperatives reveal Lady Macbeth's desperate attempt to command away guilt as she once commanded Macbeth — but language itself has failed her.
  • The fragmented syntax contrasts sharply with her earlier eloquent manipulation, showing guilt has shattered her linguistic and psychological control.
  • The word 'damned' carries both a physical curse and a theological meaning — Lady Macbeth unconsciously acknowledges her own damnation.

Point 4

Banquo's ghost at the banquet manifests Macbeth's guilt as a public spectacle, destroying the very performance of kingship that his crimes were meant to secure.

“Thou canst not say I did it: never shake thy gory locks at me” [Macbeth] Act 3, Scene 4

  • Macbeth's defensive denial ('canst not say I did it') reveals that his guilty conscience is accusing him through the hallucination — the ghost is his own guilt made visible.
  • The image of 'gory locks' forces the physical horror of murder into the civilised space of the banquet, collapsing the separation between Macbeth's public and private selves.
  • Shakespeare shows that guilt refuses to remain hidden — it erupts into the public sphere, destroying the facade of legitimate kingship Macbeth has tried to construct.

“It will have blood, they say: blood will have blood” [Macbeth] Act 3, Scene 4

  • The proverbial statement acknowledges the cycle of violence and retribution that guilt demands — each murder creates a debt that must be paid in further blood.
  • The repetition of 'blood' drives home the inescapability of guilt — it echoes through the play like a heartbeat that cannot be silenced.
  • Shakespeare presents guilt as a natural law as certain as gravity: moral transgression will always produce consequences, regardless of the transgressor's power.

Macbeth explores the dangerous instability of appearances, demonstrating that in a world where 'fair is foul, and foul is fair,' the gap between what is seen and what is true enables deception, corruption, and the collapse of moral and political order.

Appearance vs Reality

Point 1

The Witches establish from the play's opening that moral categories are unstable, setting up a world where nothing can be trusted at face value.

“Fair is foul, and foul is fair” [The Witches] Act 1, Scene 1

  • The chiasmus collapses the distinction between good and evil, suggesting that in this world moral categories are arbitrary and reversible.
  • The trochaic tetrameter — distinct from the iambic pentameter of human characters — marks the Witches as otherworldly, their irregular rhythm mirroring the disruption they bring.
  • This line functions as proleptic irony, foreshadowing Macbeth's journey from 'fair' (brave warrior) to 'foul' (tyrannical murderer).

“So foul and fair a day I have not seen” [Macbeth] Act 1, Scene 3

  • Macbeth's first line unknowingly echoes the Witches' incantation, immediately linking him to their world of moral inversion.
  • The oxymoron 'foul and fair' in a single day suggests Macbeth already inhabits a reality where contradictions coexist — preparing the audience for his transformation.
  • Shakespeare uses this verbal echo to suggest that the boundary between human and supernatural, between free will and fate, is already blurring.

Point 2

Lady Macbeth instructs Macbeth in the art of deception, making concealment of true intent a deliberate strategy for achieving power.

“Look like th'innocent flower, but be the serpent under't” [Lady Macbeth] Act 1, Scene 5

  • The biblical serpent allusion positions the Macbeths' deception as a re-enactment of the Fall of Man, with Duncan as innocent Adam.
  • The juxtaposition of flower and serpent creates a semantic field of concealment — beauty hides lethal intent, hospitality conceals murder.
  • Lady Macbeth makes deception a conscious, rational strategy, which is more chilling than impulsive violence — evil is calculated and performed.

“False face must hide what the false heart doth know” [Macbeth] Act 1, Scene 7

  • Macbeth adopts Lady Macbeth's strategy, committing to a permanent gap between appearance (false face) and reality (false heart).
  • The repetition of 'false' emphasises that deception has now infected every level of Macbeth's being — both his public and private selves are corrupted.
  • Shakespeare uses the couplet form to create an air of resolve, as though Macbeth is sealing a pact with evil — the rhyme locks him into his decision.

Point 3

Duncan's fatal inability to read appearances demonstrates that the gap between surface and truth is deadly — trust in a world of deception leads to destruction.

“There's no art to find the mind's construction in the face” [King Duncan] Act 1, Scene 4

  • Duncan acknowledges that appearances are unreliable but fails to apply this wisdom — he immediately places his trust in Macbeth, the very man who will murder him.
  • The dramatic irony is devastating: the audience watches Duncan walk into a trap he has himself identified.
  • Shakespeare suggests that in a world where appearance and reality have been separated, even wisdom is insufficient protection — the innocent are always vulnerable.

“This castle hath a pleasant seat” [King Duncan] Act 1, Scene 6

  • Duncan's admiration of Macbeth's castle — the site of his imminent murder — is Shakespeare's most cruel dramatic irony.
  • The gentle language of hospitality and beauty creates a devastating contrast with the 'serpent' that lurks within, proving that appearances are fatally misleading.
  • Shakespeare uses Duncan's innocence to heighten the horror of the Macbeths' betrayal — the greater the trust, the worse the treachery.

Point 4

As the play progresses, the gap between appearance and reality collapses — guilt forces the truth to the surface through hallucinations, sleepwalking, and madness, proving that deception cannot be sustained indefinitely.

“Out, damned spot! Out, I say!” [Lady Macbeth] Act 5, Scene 1

  • The woman who once commanded 'look like th'innocent flower' can no longer maintain any facade — her private guilt erupts uncontrollably into the public sphere.
  • The switch from verse to prose signals the complete collapse of the controlled, articulate persona she constructed in Acts 1 and 2.
  • Shakespeare argues that the gap between appearance and reality cannot be sustained — truth will always surface, often in the most destructive way possible.

“I have almost forgot the taste of fears” [Macbeth] Act 5, Scene 5

  • Macbeth has moved beyond deception into numbness — he no longer needs to perform false emotions because he has lost the capacity for genuine ones.
  • The ironic 'almost' suggests a trace of humanity remains, making his nihilistic despair more tragic than complete moral death would be.
  • Shakespeare shows that the ultimate consequence of living in falsehood is the destruction of authentic experience — when everything is a lie, nothing feels real.

Macbeth uses the supernatural to explore the boundaries of human understanding and moral agency, leaving deliberately ambiguous whether the Witches control Macbeth's fate or merely reveal the darkness already within him — forcing the audience to question where destiny ends and free will begins.

The Supernatural

Point 1

The Witches' prophecies ignite Macbeth's ambition, but Shakespeare leaves deliberately ambiguous whether they cause his actions or merely predict what he would have chosen anyway.

“All hail, Macbeth, that shalt be king hereafter!” [Third Witch] Act 1, Scene 3

  • The prophecy uses the future tense ('shalt be') not the imperative ('become'), suggesting prediction rather than instruction — but Macbeth interprets it as a call to action.
  • The ceremonial 'All hail' grants the prophecy religious authority, echoing the greeting given to kings and even Christ, blurring the line between divine revelation and demonic temptation.
  • Shakespeare creates a deliberate ambiguity: are the Witches agents of fate, or are they exploiting ambition that already existed within Macbeth?

“If chance will have me king, why, chance may crown me without my stir” [Macbeth] Act 1, Scene 3

  • Macbeth initially considers letting fate take its course — this moment of passivity is his last chance to avoid moral catastrophe.
  • The conditional 'if' shows Macbeth is still reasoning, not yet consumed — the supernatural has planted a seed, but he still has the agency to reject it.
  • Shakespeare uses this aside to demonstrate that the supernatural does not compel — it tempts, and the human must choose whether to act.

Point 2

Lady Macbeth's invocation of dark spirits reveals how the supernatural is actively invited in — the Macbeths do not merely encounter evil but summon it willingly.

“Come, you spirits that tend on mortal thoughts, unsex me here” [Lady Macbeth] Act 1, Scene 5

  • Lady Macbeth deliberately invokes supernatural evil, asking dark spirits to strip away her feminine compassion and fill her with cruelty.
  • The imperative 'Come' suggests agency — she is not a passive victim of supernatural forces but an active participant in summoning them.
  • For a Jacobean audience who believed in demonic possession, this speech would be genuinely terrifying — Lady Macbeth is opening herself to damnation.

“Come, thick night, and pall thee in the dunnest smoke of hell” [Lady Macbeth] Act 1, Scene 5

  • The imagery of hell's smoke explicitly links Lady Macbeth's ambition to the demonic, suggesting her power comes at the cost of her soul.
  • The command to 'thick night' to conceal her actions reveals that the supernatural and deception are intertwined — evil operates in darkness.
  • Shakespeare establishes that the Macbeths' relationship with the supernatural is transactional — they trade their humanity for power, and will be destroyed by the bargain.

Point 3

Macbeth's hallucinations — the dagger and Banquo's ghost — blur the boundary between the supernatural and the psychological, leaving the audience uncertain whether they witness real spirits or guilty projections.

“Is this a dagger which I see before me, the handle toward my hand?” [Macbeth] Act 2, Scene 1

  • The rhetorical question reveals Macbeth cannot distinguish between reality and hallucination — the supernatural has invaded his perception of the world.
  • If the dagger is supernatural, it suggests fate is guiding Macbeth toward murder; if it is psychological, it reveals his own guilt-ridden mind creating visions.
  • Shakespeare deliberately refuses to resolve this ambiguity, forcing the audience to confront the same uncertainty Macbeth experiences.

“Thou canst not say I did it: never shake thy gory locks at me” [Macbeth] Act 3, Scene 4

  • Only Macbeth can see Banquo's ghost — the supernatural here functions as visible guilt, manifesting in the very setting where Macbeth performs legitimate kingship.
  • Macbeth's defensive denial reveals that his guilty conscience is projecting the accusation he fears most — the ghost is both supernatural visitation and psychological breakdown.
  • The banquet scene collapses public and private: the supernatural forces Macbeth's hidden guilt into the open, destroying his ability to maintain appearances.

Point 4

The Witches' final prophecies in Act 4 demonstrate how the supernatural manipulates through equivocation — technically true statements designed to create a false sense of security that leads to Macbeth's destruction.

“none of woman born shall harm Macbeth” [Second Apparition] Act 4, Scene 1

  • The prophecy equivocates: Macduff was 'from his mother's womb untimely ripped' (caesarean birth), technically not 'born' in the natural sense.
  • Shakespeare uses the supernatural's deceptive language to mirror the play's wider theme of appearance vs reality — even prophecy cannot be taken at face value.
  • Macbeth interprets the prophecy as invulnerability, proving that the supernatural's greatest power is exploiting human vanity and desire for certainty.

“Macbeth shall never vanquished be until Great Birnam Wood to high Dunsinane Hill shall come” [Third Apparition] Act 4, Scene 1

  • This apparently impossible condition gives Macbeth false confidence — yet Malcolm's soldiers carry branches from Birnam Wood, fulfilling the prophecy literally.
  • The supernatural prophecies are technically truthful but deliberately misleading, mirroring the Jesuitical equivocation that James I feared and prosecuted.
  • Shakespeare ultimately presents the supernatural as a force that reveals truth through lies — every prophecy comes true, but never in the way Macbeth expects.

Macbeth exploits toxic ideals of manhood to drive Macbeth to murder, while the play ultimately redefines true masculinity through Macduff's capacity for open grief.

Masculinity & Gender

Point 1

Lady Macbeth deliberately rejects femininity to gain the power Jacobean society denied women, invoking dark spirits to strip away the compassion and nurturing associated with womanhood.

“Come, you spirits that tend on mortal thoughts, unsex me here” [Lady Macbeth] Act 1, Scene 5

  • 'Unsex me' is the most radical gender statement in Shakespeare — she demands the removal of her biological sex because she recognises that femininity, as Jacobean society defines it, is incompatible with power.
  • The invocation to spirits implies that gender transgression requires supernatural intervention — it is 'unnatural', which for a Jacobean audience links it directly to demonic corruption.
  • Shakespeare explores how patriarchal structures force women to destroy their own identities to access power — the system, not Lady Macbeth alone, is the root cause.

“Come to my woman's breasts, and take my milk for gall” [Lady Macbeth] Act 1, Scene 5

  • The transformation of milk (nurture, motherhood) into gall (bitterness, poison) is Shakespeare's most visceral image of femininity destroyed — the maternal replaced by the toxic.
  • Breasts and milk are the defining symbols of motherhood in Jacobean culture; their corruption signals a fundamental assault on the natural order.
  • This imagery makes her later collapse more devastating: the 'unsexing' she requested was temporary; conscience and maternal feeling return with annihilating force in Act 5.

Point 2

Lady Macbeth weaponises Jacobean ideals of masculinity to manipulate Macbeth — she redefines 'manhood' as the willingness to kill, exploiting the culture's toxic equation of masculinity with violence.

“When you durst do it, then you were a man; and to be more than what you were, you would be so much more the man” [Lady Macbeth] Act 1, Scene 7

  • She links manhood directly to murder; to refuse is to be less than a man — Shakespeare exposes how gender expectations can be weaponised to compel violence.
  • 'More the man' creates an impossible escalation: masculinity is always insufficient, always requiring proof through greater acts; Shakespeare anticipates the modern concept of toxic masculinity.
  • The manipulation works because Macbeth shares the culture's assumptions — he cannot bear the accusation of cowardice; his tragedy is partly the tragedy of a man trapped by gender ideology.

“I dare do all that may become a man; who dares do more is none” [Macbeth] Act 1, Scene 7

  • Macbeth briefly offers an alternative definition: true manhood has LIMITS; to exceed them is to become 'none' (inhuman) — this is the play's healthiest gender statement.
  • Shakespeare gives Macbeth the correct answer, then shows him abandon it — he sees the truth but cannot maintain it against Lady Macbeth's assault on his identity.
  • The tragedy is that Macbeth KNOWS the right definition of manhood but allows a toxic version to overrule it — understanding is not enough without the courage to sustain it.

Point 3

As Macbeth descends into tyranny, he adopts an increasingly hollow performance of aggression — each escalation in brutality is a further attempt to prove a manhood he can never secure.

“Be bloody, bold and resolute” [Second Apparition] Act 4, Scene 1

  • The supernatural endorses the toxic masculine ideal: 'bloody, bold and resolute' defines manhood as violence, confidence, and ruthlessness — a trap disguised as encouragement.
  • Macbeth embraces this and orders the murder of Macduff's entire family, including children — masculinity performed as dominance requires the destruction of the vulnerable.
  • Shakespeare shows the supernatural feeding Macbeth exactly what his distorted masculinity wants to hear — the spirits are mirrors reflecting his worst values.

“I have almost forgot the taste of fears... I have supped full with horrors” [Macbeth] Act 5, Scene 5

  • Emotional numbness presented as masculine strength — Macbeth has committed so many murders that he can no longer feel fear; Shakespeare shows this is not courage but moral death.
  • 'Supped full with horrors' uses a domestic image (eating) for violence — the casual tone reveals how normalised brutality has become; masculinity has consumed his humanity.
  • Shakespeare's critique: when a culture defines manhood as the suppression of emotion, it creates men who cannot feel anything at all, not even their own destruction.

Point 4

Shakespeare offers a redemptive alternative through Macduff — a warrior whose capacity to grieve openly becomes the play's most powerful act of courage, redefining what it truly means to be a man.

“He has no children” [Macduff] Act 4, Scene 3

  • Four words — the play's most emotionally devastating line; Macduff refuses consolation because grief of this magnitude cannot be answered; Shakespeare presents open mourning as strength.
  • The brevity is the point: where Macbeth fills silence with rhetoric, Macduff's grief is so complete it almost exceeds language — the antithesis of performative masculinity.
  • Malcolm has told him to 'dispute it like a man' — Macduff's response implicitly rejects that definition; his manhood does not require the suppression of emotion.

“I shall do so; but I must also feel it as a man” [Macduff] Act 4, Scene 3

  • Shakespeare's definitive statement: 'feel it AS a man' — not despite being a man but BECAUSE of being one; feeling is redefined as a masculine quality, not a weakness.
  • This directly contradicts Lady Macbeth's 'when you durst do it, then you were a man' — Macduff's version: when you dare to FEEL, then you are a man.
  • Macduff goes on to kill Macbeth — proving that emotional authenticity and martial courage are not opposites; the man who feels most deeply fights most justly.

Macbeth is driven by fate or free will — instead, the play sustains the tension between prophecy and choice, presenting a world where both operate simultaneously and neither can excuse the other.

Fate vs Free Will

Point 1

The Witches' prophecy creates the central ambiguity: does knowing the future compel it, or does Macbeth freely choose to pursue what was merely predicted? Shakespeare deliberately leaves this unresolved.

“If chance will have me king, why, chance may crown me without my stir” [Macbeth] Act 1, Scene 3

  • Macbeth briefly considers letting fate take its course — if the prophecy is true, he need not act; this is his most rational and morally clear moment.
  • The word 'stir' is deliberately understated — the distance between 'no stir' and regicide is Macbeth's entire tragedy.
  • He abandons this position almost immediately, revealing that ambition, not fate, is the driving force — Shakespeare uses the passive option to expose how quickly Macbeth rejects it.

“Come what come may, time and the hour runs through the roughest day” [Macbeth] Act 1, Scene 3

  • On the surface, Macbeth surrenders to time and chance; but the forced casualness conceals the 'horrible imaginings' he has just described.
  • Shakespeare dramatises the gap between what people SAY about fate and what they DO — Macbeth talks like a fatalist but acts like a man who believes he controls his own destiny.
  • The rhyming couplet creates a false sense of resolution — Macbeth performs acceptance while his mind is already racing toward action.

Point 2

Lady Macbeth's persuasion adds another layer of causation — Macbeth's decision to murder is driven by human pressure and gender politics as much as by supernatural prophecy.

“What beast was't, then, that made you break this enterprise to me?” [Lady Macbeth] Act 1, Scene 7

  • Lady Macbeth implies Macbeth proposed the murder himself, suggesting the ambition predates even the Witches; the layers of causation multiply beyond any single explanation.
  • By calling his hesitation 'beastly', she makes the choice about identity rather than fate — you already chose, she insists; now follow through or be diminished.
  • Shakespeare piles cause upon cause: Witches, ambition, wife, masculinity — the complexity prevents any single explanation, which is precisely his point.

“I am settled, and bend up each corporal agent to this terrible feat” [Macbeth] Act 1, Scene 7

  • 'Settled' — a word of resolution, not compulsion; Macbeth presents the decision as his own conscious act; Shakespeare gives him full agency at the moment of his worst choice.
  • 'Bend up each corporal agent' = every part of his body directed toward murder; the physical language suggests effort, not inevitability — this requires his deliberate will.
  • If Macbeth were truly fated, he would not need to 'settle' himself — the very effort of decision-making argues for free will.

Point 3

The Witches' equivocating prophecies in Act 4 create an illusion of invulnerability that accelerates Macbeth's destruction — belief in fate becomes the mechanism through which free will makes its worst decisions.

“None of woman born shall harm Macbeth” [Second Apparition] Act 4, Scene 1

  • The equivocation is true in letter but false in implication; Macbeth reads it as divine guarantee when it is actually a trap designed to encourage the recklessness that destroys him.
  • Shakespeare creates a paradox: Macbeth's belief in fate leads to free choices (reckless tyranny) that ensure fate's fulfilment (his death) — fate and free will are collaborators, not opposites.
  • The audience knows the prophecy contains its own exception — dramatic irony positions them as witnesses to a man freely walking into a trap he believes is his salvation.

“Then live, Macduff. What need I fear of thee? But yet I'll make assurance double sure” [Macbeth] Act 4, Scene 1

  • Macbeth believes fate protects him — 'what need I fear' — but immediately acts to override it: 'I'll make assurance double sure'; he cannot trust even the fate he claims to accept.
  • 'Double sure' is a legal metaphor — Macbeth tries to bind fate to a contract, revealing he treats destiny as something to control, not accept; this is free will disguised as fatalism.
  • The decision to murder Macduff's family (a free choice born from false security) ensures Macduff's vengeance — free will builds the very trap fate has laid.

Point 4

By the play's conclusion, Shakespeare presents both fate and free will as simultaneously true: Macbeth was prophesied to fall AND chose every step that led to his destruction — the moral lesson requires both.

“Macduff was from his mother's womb untimely ripped” [Macduff] Act 5, Scene 8

  • The equivocation unravels — 'untimely ripped' reveals the loophole; fate engineered Macbeth's destroyer from birth, suggesting Providence was always in control.
  • Yet Macbeth's free choices made this moment possible: he created an enemy by murdering Macduff's family; without that decision, Macduff might never have become his nemesis.
  • Shakespeare's resolution: fate provides the instrument (Macduff), free will provides the motive (vengeance) — both are necessary; neither alone explains the tragedy.

“Of this dead butcher and his fiend-like queen” [Malcolm] Act 5, Scene 8

  • Malcolm's verdict reduces Macbeth to 'butcher' and Lady Macbeth to 'fiend' — this is the political judgement: free will, not fate, made them criminals; they are morally responsible.
  • Yet the audience, having witnessed their inner lives through soliloquies, knows this summary is reductive — Shakespeare creates a gap between the political verdict and the theatrical experience.
  • The play's final word: the state needs clear moral judgement ('butcher'), but art reveals the terrifying complexity of human choice under supernatural pressure.