9StraightNines

Theme Analysis Sheets

The Sign of Four — 4 themes · A4 printable

The Sign of Four The Sign of the Four interrogates the boundaries of justice, exposing a tension between the rigid mechanisms of Victorian law and a deeper, more human sense of moral fairness — ultimately suggesting that the legal system serves the powerful while failing those whom empire has already wronged.

Justice & the Law

Point 1

Holmes operates outside official law enforcement, suggesting that true justice requires an intellect and moral independence that institutions cannot provide.

“I am the last and highest court of appeal in detection” [Sherlock Holmes] Chapter 1

  • The superlative 'last and highest' elevates Holmes above every official institution, positioning him as a superior alternative to Scotland Yard and the judicial system.
  • The legal metaphor 'court of appeal' frames Holmes's private detective work in the language of the law itself, implying he has assumed the role that the state has failed to fulfil.
  • Conan Doyle reflects a Victorian anxiety that official institutions were inadequate in the face of increasingly complex urban crime, requiring the exceptional individual to restore order.

“I think that you have done it all off your own bat. That is unofficial” [Inspector Athelney Jones] Chapter 6

  • Jones's use of 'unofficial' acknowledges that Holmes's methods exist outside the boundaries of sanctioned law enforcement, highlighting the divide between procedural legality and effective justice.
  • The colloquial idiom 'off your own bat' diminishes Holmes's intellectual superiority to a casual sporting achievement, revealing the police's discomfort with their own inadequacy.
  • Conan Doyle uses the police's reluctant dependence on Holmes to critique a Victorian justice system that privileged rank and procedure over genuine competence.

Point 2

Jonathan Small's narrative complicates simple notions of criminality by presenting a man whose lawlessness was born from colonial injustice and exploitation.

“The loot is mine, my rights I'll have. I have earned it by the sweat of my brow and the risk of my life” [Jonathan Small] Chapter 12

  • Small appropriates the language of honest labour — 'sweat of my brow' — to justify his claim to stolen treasure, blurring the boundary between legitimate earnings and colonial plunder.
  • The possessive pronoun 'mine' and the emphatic 'my rights' reveal Small's conviction that natural justice supersedes legal ownership, challenging the Victorian legal framework.
  • Conan Doyle invites the reader to consider whether Small's claim is any less legitimate than the British Empire's own extraction of wealth from India — both involve taking by force.

“I would rather swing a score of times, or have one of Tonga's darts in my hide, than live in a convict's cell and feel that another man is at his ease in a palace with the money that should be mine” [Jonathan Small] Chapter 12

  • The violent imagery of 'swing' (hanging) and 'Tonga's darts' reveals a man for whom death is preferable to the injustice of someone else profiting from his suffering.
  • The antithesis of 'convict's cell' and 'palace' exposes the arbitrary nature of Victorian justice — the difference between imprisonment and luxury is not morality but social position.
  • Conan Doyle uses Small's passionate rhetoric to generate sympathy for the villain, complicating the reader's moral judgement and questioning whether the law delivers true justice.

Point 3

Athelney Jones represents the official legal system, whose incompetence and eagerness to arrest the wrong suspect reveal institutional justice as performative rather than genuine.

“Facts are better than mere theories, after all. There is a great deal of solid evidence in this case” [Inspector Athelney Jones] Chapter 6

  • The irony is that Jones's 'facts' are entirely wrong — he arrests the innocent Thaddeus Sholto, exposing the official system's tendency to grasp at convenient conclusions rather than truth.
  • The dismissive modifier 'mere' before 'theories' is directed at Holmes, yet it is Holmes's theoretical reasoning that ultimately solves the case, inverting Jones's hierarchy of evidence.
  • Conan Doyle satirises the professional confidence of institutional law enforcement, suggesting that its authority rests on self-assurance rather than actual competence.

“We have got to the deductions and the inferences. I find it hard enough to tackle facts, Inspector Jones, without flying away after theories and fancies” [Inspector Athelney Jones] Chapter 6

  • Jones's rejection of 'deductions and inferences' as 'fancies' dismisses the scientific method that lies at the heart of Holmes's genius, revealing a system that fears intellectual rigour.
  • The verb 'flying away' caricatures reasoning as reckless escapism, when in fact Jones's own earthbound literalism leads him to arrest an innocent man.
  • Conan Doyle critiques a justice system that mistakes surface-level evidence for truth, arguing that genuine justice requires the deeper analysis that only Holmes can provide.

Point 4

The resolution of the case — with the treasure lost and justice only partially served — suggests that the Victorian legal system cannot fully restore what empire and greed have destroyed.

“Whoever had lost a treasure, I knew that night that I had gained one” [Dr Watson] Chapter 12

  • Watson's romantic epiphany redefines 'treasure' from material wealth to human love, suggesting that the legal pursuit of the Agra jewels was never the story's true resolution.
  • The antithesis of 'lost' and 'gained' implies that the novel's justice is poetic rather than legal — the official outcome matters less than the personal and moral one.
  • Conan Doyle closes the narrative by privileging emotional fulfilment over legal resolution, implying that the Victorian justice system addresses the symptoms of greed but not its causes.

“The treasure is lost. They have scattered it over the Thames” [Inspector Athelney Jones] Chapter 11

  • The passive construction 'is lost' removes any agent from the destruction of the treasure, as though the wealth — built on colonial violence — was always destined to be unrecoverable.
  • The image of the jewels 'scattered over the Thames' symbolically returns the plundered Indian wealth to an irretrievable void, denying any party — legal or criminal — final possession.
  • Conan Doyle suggests that colonial wealth poisons everything it touches: the treasure that motivated murder, betrayal, and obsession ultimately benefits no one, rendering the entire legal pursuit futile.

The Sign of Four The Sign of the Four reveals the violence, exploitation, and moral corruption at the heart of the British Empire, demonstrating that the wealth extracted from colonised nations does not enrich Britain but instead breeds greed, murder, and social decay at home.

Empire & Colonialism

Point 1

The Agra treasure functions as a symbol of colonial plunder, and its journey from India to London traces the pathway by which imperial exploitation poisons domestic British life.

“An iron box was found in the wall with the treasure inside it — gold and jewels, which alone were worth over half a million sterling” [Jonathan Small] Chapter 12

  • The listing of 'gold and jewels' emphasises the sheer material excess extracted from India, confronting the reader with the reality of imperial theft disguised as adventure.
  • The monetary valuation 'over half a million sterling' appraises stolen cultural wealth in British currency, reflecting how the Empire commodified and dehumanised the civilisations it plundered.
  • Conan Doyle traces how this colonial treasure becomes the catalyst for every act of violence in the novel, arguing that wealth built on exploitation carries an inherent moral corruption.

“It was to be the sign of four — the sign that we four would always stand together” [Jonathan Small] Chapter 12

  • The 'sign of four' — a pact between Small and three Sikh accomplices — represents an unholy alliance forged by colonial greed, binding men across racial lines only through shared criminality.
  • The irony of 'always stand together' is that the pact collapses entirely: betrayal, imprisonment, and murder follow, demonstrating that alliances built on stolen wealth cannot endure.
  • Conan Doyle uses this broken compact to allegorise the instability of empire itself — colonial partnerships are transactional, not principled, and inevitably self-destruct.

Point 2

Tonga is subjected to a dehumanising colonial gaze by Watson's narration, revealing how Victorian imperial ideology constructed racial otherness to justify domination.

“a savage, distorted creature” [Dr Watson] Chapter 10

  • The dehumanising noun 'creature' strips Tonga of his humanity entirely, reducing him from a person to an animal — a rhetorical move that mirrors the imperial justification for subjugating colonised peoples.
  • The adjective 'savage' invokes the racist Victorian binary of 'civilised' versus 'savage' that underpinned the entire ideology of empire.
  • Conan Doyle, through Watson's narration, exposes how language itself becomes a tool of colonial violence — by naming Tonga a 'creature', the narrative pre-emptively justifies his killing.

“Never have I seen features so deeply marked with all bestiality and cruelty” [Dr Watson] Chapter 10

  • The hyperbolic 'Never have I seen' presents Tonga as uniquely monstrous, erasing his individuality and replacing it with a racist archetype of colonial fear.
  • The noun 'bestiality' continues the dehumanising animal imagery, while 'cruelty' projects moral judgement onto physical appearance — a hallmark of Victorian pseudo-scientific racism.
  • While Watson is the narrator, Conan Doyle invites a critical reading: it is not Tonga but the colonial system that has produced the violence the novel describes, and the reader must question whose 'cruelty' is truly on display.

Point 3

Major Sholto's theft of the treasure and subsequent paranoid decline illustrates how colonial wealth corrupts those who seize it, turning the coloniser into a prisoner of his own guilt.

“He would go out nowhere except to the garden. He became very suspicious and would not trust anyone. He kept a staff of prize-fighters and he never went out at night without a revolver” [Thaddeus Sholto] Chapter 4

  • The listing of paranoid behaviours — seclusion, distrust, armed guards, a revolver — constructs Major Sholto as a man imprisoned by his own stolen wealth, mirroring the incarceration he inflicted on Small.
  • The irony is that the treasure, supposedly the reward of empire, delivers not comfort but terror — Conan Doyle argues that colonial plunder destroys the plunderer as surely as the plundered.
  • The domestic setting of Pondicherry Lodge, named after a colonial territory, symbolically brings the violence of empire into the English home, refusing to let the reader separate imperial adventure from its consequences.

“Sholto must have told some of his people about the treasure, and one of them has done this deed” [Dr Watson] Chapter 5

  • Watson's initial misreading of Bartholomew Sholto's murder demonstrates how the domestic consequences of colonial theft confound even the rational observer.
  • The phrase 'his people' is ambiguous — it could refer to servants or associates — reflecting the networks of complicity and exploitation that colonial wealth generates.
  • Conan Doyle structures the mystery so that the murder at its centre is a direct consequence of imperial theft, ensuring the reader cannot enjoy the detective plot without confronting its colonial origins.

Point 4

Jonathan Small's account of India presents the colony as a site of chaos and moral disintegration, where ordinary men are drawn into violence by the structures of imperial exploitation.

“When I first landed in India my army life was one long course of misfortune and disaster. I lost my leg in a crocodile attack, and was invalided out of the regiment” [Jonathan Small] Chapter 12

  • The catalogue of suffering — 'misfortune', 'disaster', the loss of his leg — presents India not as the land of opportunity that imperial propaganda promised, but as a site of bodily destruction for ordinary British soldiers.
  • The crocodile attack functions as a literal manifestation of colonial danger, but also symbolises how the Empire devours its own agents — Small is consumed by the very territory he was sent to control.
  • Conan Doyle uses Small's backstory to generate sympathy, complicating the villain's characterisation and suggesting that the colonial system, not the individual, is the true antagonist.

“It seemed to me that there was no getting away from the shadow of the great mutiny, and I made my way back to the army as a sort of last resource” [Jonathan Small] Chapter 12

  • The metaphor of the 'shadow' of the mutiny suggests that colonial violence is an inescapable atmosphere that pervades every aspect of life in India, not a discrete event.
  • Small's return to the army as a 'last resource' reveals the limited agency of working-class men within the imperial machine — they serve the Empire not out of patriotism but desperation.
  • Conan Doyle exposes the reality that the British Empire's foot soldiers were often its victims too, trapped in a system that exploited their poverty as readily as it exploited colonised peoples.

The Sign of Four The Sign of the Four celebrates the power of scientific reasoning as a force capable of penetrating mystery and restoring order, yet simultaneously reveals its limitations — suggesting that pure logic, divorced from human emotion, becomes sterile and even self-destructive.

Science & Reason

Point 1

Holmes's deductive method is presented as a quasi-scientific discipline that elevates detection from guesswork to a rigorous intellectual system.

“Detection is, or ought to be, an exact science and should be treated in the same cold and unemotional manner” [Sherlock Holmes] Chapter 1

  • The declarative statement 'is, or ought to be' reveals Holmes's frustration that detection is not yet universally recognised as a science, positioning himself as a pioneer of rational methodology.
  • The adjectives 'cold and unemotional' elevate detachment to a professional virtue, reflecting the Victorian valorisation of empiricism and the scientific method above all other ways of knowing.
  • Conan Doyle uses Holmes to embody the late-Victorian faith in positivism — the belief that all phenomena, including human behaviour, can be understood through systematic observation and logic.

“How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth” [Sherlock Holmes] Chapter 6

  • This famous maxim codifies Holmes's reasoning as a process of logical elimination, granting it the authority of a scientific formula or mathematical proof.
  • The adverb 'however improbable' acknowledges that truth may defy common sense, but insists that reason will always arrive there — a profoundly optimistic statement about human intellect.
  • Conan Doyle positions Holmes as the embodiment of Enlightenment rationalism, offering the Victorian reader reassurance that even the most bewildering mysteries yield to disciplined thought.

Point 2

Watson functions as the empirical observer whose role is to document and marvel at Holmes's method, mirroring the relationship between scientific genius and the educated public.

“You really are an automaton — a calculating machine. There is something positively inhuman in you at times” [Dr Watson] Chapter 2

  • The mechanical metaphors 'automaton' and 'calculating machine' reduce Holmes to a device, suggesting that his commitment to pure reason has cost him his humanity.
  • The adverb 'positively' intensifies the accusation of being 'inhuman', revealing Watson's genuine unease that Holmes's intellect has eclipsed his capacity for empathy.
  • Conan Doyle uses Watson's discomfort to voice the novel's central tension: science and reason are powerful, but when they exclude emotion entirely, they produce something disturbing rather than admirable.

“I was annoyed at this criticism of a work which had been a labour of love” [Dr Watson] Chapter 1

  • Watson's reference to his account of A Study in Scarlet as a 'labour of love' contrasts his emotional, narrative approach to crime with Holmes's purely analytical one.
  • The word 'annoyed' reveals genuine hurt, establishing that Watson values human feeling and literary craft — qualities Holmes dismisses as irrelevant to scientific truth.
  • Conan Doyle uses this opening disagreement to frame the entire novel as a debate between the scientific and the emotional, the rational and the romantic — embodied by Holmes and Watson respectively.

Point 3

Holmes's forensic analysis of physical evidence demonstrates the practical triumphs of the scientific method, bringing order to what appears chaotic.

“I can distinguish at a glance the ash of any known brand either of cigar or of tobacco” [Sherlock Holmes] Chapter 1

  • The specificity of Holmes's claim — identifying tobacco ash 'at a glance' — presents his knowledge as encyclopaedic and his observation as instantaneous, elevating him to near-superhuman scientific authority.
  • This detail reflects the Victorian fascination with classification and taxonomy — the same impulse that drove Darwin, Linnaeus, and the great natural historians to catalogue the world.
  • Conan Doyle uses such moments to reassure the reader that no detail is too small for science to decode, reinforcing the comforting Victorian belief in a knowable, orderly universe.

“I have here four letters which purport to come from the unknown. Let me see the other. Yes; they are disguised hands; but there is a family resemblance” [Sherlock Holmes] Chapter 2

  • Holmes's ability to detect a 'family resemblance' in disguised handwriting demonstrates the forensic application of scientific observation to human behaviour.
  • The verb 'purport' signals Holmes's refusal to accept surface appearances, embodying the scientific principle that evidence must be tested rather than taken at face value.
  • Conan Doyle presents handwriting analysis as a legitimate branch of detection science, reflecting the growing Victorian interest in graphology and forensic evidence as tools of justice.

Point 4

Holmes's cocaine use reveals the dark side of the scientific mind — when deprived of intellectual stimulation, reason turns inward and becomes self-destructive.

“Give me problems, give me work, give me the most abstruse cryptogram, or the most intricate analysis, and I am in my own proper atmosphere” [Sherlock Holmes] Chapter 1

  • The anaphoric repetition of 'give me' creates an almost desperate plea for intellectual stimulation, revealing that Holmes's brilliant mind is also a burden that demands constant occupation.
  • The phrase 'my own proper atmosphere' suggests Holmes can only truly exist when engaged in rational problem-solving — without it, he suffocates, hence his resort to cocaine.
  • Conan Doyle implies that the scientific mind, for all its power, is inherently restless and potentially self-destructive — reason without purpose becomes a kind of madness.

“My mind rebels at stagnation. Give me problems, give me work” [Sherlock Holmes] Chapter 1

  • The verb 'rebels' personifies Holmes's intellect as an autonomous force that he cannot fully control, suggesting his genius is as much a curse as a gift.
  • The noun 'stagnation' frames inactivity as a form of decay, revealing that for Holmes, the absence of intellectual challenge is not rest but deterioration.
  • Conan Doyle connects Holmes's need for stimulation directly to his drug use, warning that Victorian society's worship of reason must reckon with the psychological cost it inflicts on those who embody it.

The Sign of Four The Sign of the Four presents a world of pervasive duality — reason versus emotion, respectability versus vice, the domestic versus the exotic — and uses Holmes's cocaine addiction to argue that beneath the polished surface of Victorian civilisation lies a restless, self-destructive impulse that no amount of logic can cure.

Duality & Addiction

Point 1

Holmes's cocaine use in the novel's opening pages immediately establishes the duality at his core: the supreme rationalist who depends on an irrational, destructive habit.

“Which is it to-day, morphine or cocaine?” [Dr Watson] Chapter 1

  • Watson's weary question implies this is a routine occurrence, normalising drug use within the domestic setting of Baker Street and shattering any illusion of Victorian respectability.
  • The casual conjunction 'or' presents morphine and cocaine as interchangeable options, suggesting Holmes cycles between sedation and stimulation — two poles of the same underlying restlessness.
  • Conan Doyle opens the novel not with a crime but with addiction, signalling that the most urgent mystery is not external but internal: the duality within Holmes himself.

“a seven-per-cent solution. Would you care to try it?” [Sherlock Holmes] Chapter 1

  • The precise 'seven-per-cent' applies scientific measurement to drug use, revealing how Holmes rationalises his addiction by framing it in the language of chemistry and exactitude.
  • The polite offer 'Would you care to try it?' treats cocaine as a social pleasantry, exposing the hypocrisy of a society that condemned opium dens while tolerating gentlemanly drug use in private rooms.
  • Conan Doyle uses Holmes's scientific precision to highlight the absurdity of the duality: the same mind that solves crimes with forensic rigour applies identical rigour to self-destruction.

Point 2

Watson embodies the opposing pole of the duality: emotional, moral, and human where Holmes is detached, amoral, and machine-like.

“You really are an automaton — a calculating machine. There is something positively inhuman in you at times” [Dr Watson] Chapter 2

  • Watson's accusation defines Holmes by what he lacks — warmth, empathy, humanity — establishing Watson himself as the emotional counterweight to Holmes's cold rationalism.
  • The progression from 'automaton' to 'calculating machine' to 'inhuman' escalates the dehumanisation, revealing Watson's fear that Holmes's commitment to reason has genuine psychological consequences.
  • Conan Doyle structures the Holmes-Watson partnership as a single personality split in two: together they form a complete human being, but apart each is dangerously incomplete.

“I think she is one of the most charming young ladies I ever met, and might be most useful in such work” [Dr Watson] Chapter 2

  • Watson's immediate romantic response to Mary Morstan contrasts sharply with Holmes's purely analytical assessment of her as a client, crystallising the duality between feeling and reason.
  • The self-correcting shift from 'charming' to 'useful' shows Watson attempting to adopt Holmes's rational framework but failing — his emotions overwhelm his professional detachment.
  • Conan Doyle uses Watson's capacity for love as a narrative counterbalance, arguing that the emotional life Holmes rejects is not a weakness but an essential human quality.

Point 3

The Sholto twins embody a physical duality — two brothers shaped by the same colonial inheritance but driven in opposite moral directions by greed and guilt.

“I knew my brother Bartholomew well. He would have me thrown out of the window before I could cross the threshold” [Thaddeus Sholto] Chapter 4

  • The fraternal hostility between the twins transforms the family unit into a site of conflict, mirroring how the Agra treasure corrupts every relationship it touches.
  • The violent image of being 'thrown out of the window' reveals that colonial wealth has turned brothers into enemies, replacing familial love with mutual suspicion.
  • Conan Doyle uses the Sholto twins as a doubled symbol: one brother driven by guilt to share the treasure, the other by greed to hoard it — two responses to the same imperial inheritance.

“It is my duty to send you out a fair share of this. I will send you a pearl at regular intervals” [Major Sholto (reported by Thaddeus)] Chapter 4

  • The language of 'duty' and 'fair share' applies moral vocabulary to stolen wealth, exposing the absurdity of trying to distribute colonial plunder ethically.
  • The regular intervals of pearl-sending create a ritualistic pattern, as though guilt can be managed through instalments — but Conan Doyle shows that this systematic approach fails to resolve the underlying injustice.
  • The pearls themselves become symbols of the duality between generosity and guilt: each gift simultaneously acknowledges the wrong done to Mary Morstan and perpetuates the concealment of it.

Point 4

London itself is presented as a dual city — its respectable surface concealing a dark, labyrinthine underworld — reflecting the novel's broader argument that Victorian civilisation masks corruption and decay.

“We had during this time been following the guidance of Toby down the half-rural villa-lined roads... a long, straggling line of dirty, ill-kept houses on each side” [Dr Watson] Chapter 8

  • The transition from 'villa-lined roads' to 'dirty, ill-kept houses' maps the duality of Victorian London in physical space — respectability and squalor exist side by side.
  • Watson's descriptive narration forces the reader to travel through both Londons, refusing to let the middle-class audience remain comfortably in the villas while ignoring the slums.
  • Conan Doyle uses the detective chase to literalise the novel's thematic journey: pursuing the truth means crossing from the respectable surface into the hidden darkness beneath.

“It was a September evening and not yet seven o'clock, but the day had been a dreary one, and a dense drizzly fog lay low upon the great city” [Dr Watson] Chapter 3

  • The pathetic fallacy of the 'dense drizzly fog' obscures London physically, mirroring the moral obscurity that pervades the novel — truth, like the city, is hidden beneath layers of concealment.
  • The sibilance in 'dense drizzly' creates a suffocating atmosphere, reflecting the oppressive weight of secrets, colonial guilt, and social pretence that hangs over the narrative.
  • Conan Doyle employs the fog as a recurring Gothic motif, transforming London from the proud capital of empire into a murky, uncertain space where boundaries between civilisation and savagery dissolve.