Key Quote
“"I took her hand in mine, and we went out of the ruined place... I saw no shadow of another parting from her"”
Pip (narrator) · Chapter 59 (Final Chapter)
Focus: “shadow”
The novel's ambiguous ending — Pip sees 'no shadow' of parting but does not state they stay together — leaves the reader suspended between hope and uncertainty.
Technique 1 — AMBIGUOUS CLOSURE / LITOTES
The phrase 'I saw no shadow of another parting' is a masterful litotes (understatement through double negation): Pip does not say they stayed together — he says he saw no indication they wouldn't. This negative construction refuses definitive closure, leaving the reader to decide whether this is a happy ending or a self-deluding narrator. Dickens crafts hope through the absence of evidence for despair rather than the presence of evidence for joy.
The word 'shadow' carries metaphorical weight: throughout the novel, shadows represent the darkness of Pip's past — guilt, shame, social pretension. The absence of a shadow suggests Pip has finally emerged into light, but shadows are also things that might be missed. Dickens creates an ending that is simultaneously optimistic and precarious (unstable, uncertain).
Key Words
RAD — PROGRESS
Pip progresses from the selfish snob of the middle chapters to a man capable of genuine human connection. His hand-holding — a simple, physical gesture — replaces the grandiose social ambitions that defined his younger self. The progression is toward humility: Pip no longer seeks wealth, status, or Estella's admiration but simply her companionship. This is emotional growth through reduction — becoming less, not more.
Key Words
Technique 2 — SPATIAL SYMBOLISM — 'THE RUINED PLACE'
Satis House — Miss Havisham's decayed mansion — functions as a symbol of arrested development: a space frozen in time, refusing change. Pip and Estella leaving the 'ruined place' together enacts a symbolic departure from the past's grip. The ruin is not only Miss Havisham's but Pip's — his ruined expectations, his ruined pride. By walking out, he walks away from the wreckage of his own illusions.
The verb 'went out' is notably plain — no dramatic exit, no flourish. Dickens employs deliberate understatement (expressing something with less intensity than expected) for the novel's conclusion, contrasting sharply with the Gothic excess of Satis House's interior. After 58 chapters of drama, the ending is quiet — suggesting that real life begins when the theatrical trappings of aspiration are left behind.
Key Words
Context (AO3)
THE TWO ENDINGS
Dickens originally wrote a bleaker ending where Pip and Estella meet briefly and part. On the advice of Edward Bulwer-Lytton, he rewrote the ending to be more hopeful. This editorial intervention complicates interpretation: is the published ending the 'true' ending, or a commercial compromise?
VICTORIAN CLASS MOBILITY
The novel charts Pip's social mobility (movement between social classes) — but reveals it as largely illusory. His wealth comes from a convict, his education from a mad woman, his aspirations from snobbery. Dickens suggests that Victorian class mobility was more fantasy than reality.
Key Words
WOW — THE DEATH OF THE AUTHOR (Barthes)
Roland Barthes's concept of the death of the author argues that once a text is published, the author's intentions become irrelevant — meaning is created by the READER, not the writer. The dual endings of *Great Expectations* provide a perfect case study: which ending is 'real'? Barthes would argue that both endings coexist as possibilities within the text, and the reader chooses which to accept. The ambiguity of 'I saw no shadow' is not a failure of authorial clarity but an invitation to readerly participation — the reader completes the text through interpretation. Dickens, perhaps accidentally through the revision process, created a text that embodies Barthes's theory: the author's original intention (bleak ending) was overwritten, yet the published ending retains enough ambiguity to preserve both readings. The 'meaning' of the ending is not in the text but in the reader's desire — or refusal — to believe in redemption.
Key Words