Themes:Isolation & RejectionRevenge & ViolenceLove & ConnectionPower & Control
1

Key Quote

AO1
"If I cannot inspire love, I will cause fear!"

The Creature · Chapter 17

Focus: “fear

The Creature's ultimatum — love me or fear me — reveals the psychological mechanism by which rejection transforms potential love into certain violence.

2

Technique 1 — ANTITHETICAL CONDITIONAL / ULTIMATUM

AO2

The conditional structure — 'If... I will' — creates an ultimatum (final demand with consequences): love or fear, acceptance or violence. The antithesis between 'love' and 'fear' is absolute — there is no middle ground, no negotiation. Shelley dramatises the binary logic of the rejected: when compassion is denied, only terror remains as a means of being acknowledged.

The shift from 'inspire' to 'cause' is revealing: love cannot be forced, only inspired — it requires the other's willing response. But fear CAN be caused unilaterally through violence. The lexical shift from passive ('inspire' — hoping for a response) to active ('cause' — forcing one) charts the Creature's movement from supplicant to aggressor.

Key Words

UltimatumA final demand with the threat of consequences if not metLexical shiftA change in word choice that signals a shift in meaning or attitudeSupplicantOne who humbly asks or begs for something
3

RAD — REGRESS

AO2

The Creature regresses from eloquent philosopher (his earlier speeches demonstrate remarkable intelligence and empathy) to violent threat-maker. But Shelley frames this regression as reactive (caused by external forces) rather than innate: the Creature was not born violent — he was made violent by universal rejection. His regression is evidence for Shelley's argument that monstrosity is socially constructed, not biologically predetermined.

Key Words

ReactiveOccurring as a response to external stimuli rather than arising independentlySocially constructedCreated by social conditions and treatment rather than by nature
4

Technique 2 — EXCLAMATION MARK — EMOTIONAL RUPTURE

AO2

The exclamation mark intensifies the threat: this is not a calm statement of intent but an emotional eruption. The Creature's eloquence — his most humanising quality — is overwhelmed by raw feeling. Shelley shows the moment where reasoned argument gives way to affect (raw emotional force): the Creature has tried persuasion and failed; only violence remains. The punctuation performs the emotional breaking point.

The first-person declarations — 'I cannot,' 'I will' — insist on the Creature's subjectivity (his existence as a thinking, choosing being). Even in threatening violence, the Creature asserts his personhood: he is not a mindless monster but a being who has DECIDED to cause fear. This distinction matters: deliberate violence is qualitatively different from instinctive aggression. The Creature's threat is a choice born of despair, not a revelation of innate savagery.

Key Words

AffectRaw emotional force that operates before or beyond rational thoughtSubjectivityThe quality of being a conscious, thinking, feeling agentDeliberateDone consciously and with full intention
5

Context (AO3)

AO3

ROUSSEAU & NATURAL GOODNESS

Jean-Jacques Rousseau argued that humans are born naturally good and are corrupted by society. Shelley, whose parents were influenced by Rousseau, applies this theory to the Creature: he begins life with the capacity for love and is driven to violence by social rejection. The Creature's trajectory is Rousseau's nightmare — proof that society destroys what nature creates.

THE FRENCH REVOLUTION

The Creature's transformation from peaceful to violent mirrors anxieties about the French Revolution (1789): the oppressed masses, denied dignity and justice, eventually turned to violent revolution. Shelley warns that sustained injustice inevitably breeds violent rebellion — the Creature is revolutionary as well as monster.

Key Words

Natural goodnessRousseau's belief that humans are born virtuous and corrupted by societyCorruptedChanged from a good condition to a bad one through external influenceRevolutionaryRelating to or engaged in radical, forceful change of social structures
6

WOW — THE WRETCHED OF THE EARTH (Fanon)

AO1AO2

Frantz Fanon's *The Wretched of the Earth* argues that colonised peoples, denied recognition and subjected to persistent dehumanisation, may turn to violence as the only remaining means of asserting their existence. Fanon wrote: 'The colonised man finds his freedom in and through violence.' The Creature enacts Fanon's thesis: denied love, refused recognition, treated as sub-human, he discovers that causing fear is the only way to force the world to acknowledge him. Violence becomes not mere aggression but an act of existential assertion — proof that he exists, that he matters, that he cannot be ignored. Shelley, writing 140 years before Fanon, dramatises the same insight: sustained dehumanisation does not produce docile victims — it produces revolutionaries. The Creature's violence is not evidence of his monstrosity but of society's failure.

Key Words

Existential assertionThe act of forcefully claiming one's right to exist and be recognisedDehumanisationThe systematic denial of another's human qualities and rightsDocileSubmissive, compliant; willing to accept control without resistance