Themes:Class & Social MobilityFamily & ReputationPride & Prejudice (Self-Knowledge)
1

Key Quote

AO1
"Are the shades of Pemberley to be thus polluted?"

Lady Catherine · Chapter 56

Focus: “polluted

Lady Catherine's most visceral objection to Elizabeth — the word 'polluted' reveals that she views the Bennet family as a contaminant, a biological threat to aristocratic purity. Marriage between classes is framed as environmental destruction.

2

Technique 1 — METAPHOR OF CONTAMINATION

AO2

The verb 'polluted' introduces a metaphor of environmental contamination — Elizabeth's family will poison Pemberley's purity like waste poisoning a river. The word dehumanises the Bennets: they are not people but a toxin (poisonous substance). Lady Catherine speaks as though class mixing were a form of biological threat, an attitude that borders on the eugenic (relating to selective breeding).

The noun 'shades' (meaning trees or grounds) personifies Pemberley itself — the estate becomes a living entity that can be harmed. Lady Catherine values property above people: Pemberley's 'shades' must be protected from Elizabeth's family. Austen exposes how aristocratic values prioritise land and lineage over human worth.

Key Words

Contamination metaphorDescribing something as a pollutant that poisons what it touchesEugenicRelating to the belief that breeding should be controlled for 'improvement'PersonifiesGives human qualities to a non-human thing
3

RAD — STAGNATE

AO2

Lady Catherine's use of 'polluted' reveals deep-rooted class prejudice that she has never examined. She genuinely views Elizabeth's family as a contaminant — this is not strategic rhetoric but an authentic expression of aristocratic disgust. Her inability to see Elizabeth as a worthy individual demonstrates the dehumanising effect of rigid class consciousness.

Key Words

Class prejudiceBias against people based on their social or economic positionClass consciousnessAwareness of and commitment to one's social class position
4

Technique 2 — RHETORICAL QUESTION AS WEAPON

AO2

The sentence is a rhetorical question expecting the answer 'No, of course not' — Lady Catherine assumes Elizabeth will be horrified by the idea of 'polluting' Pemberley and retreat. But Elizabeth does not play the expected role: she refuses to be ashamed. The rhetorical question, designed to close down discussion, instead opens it up. Austen shows that rhetorical dominance depends on the listener's compliance.

The phrase 'to be thus' gives the question a theatrical formality — Lady Catherine speaks as though delivering a verdict in court rather than having a conversation. Her language performs judicial authority (the power to judge and sentence), but Elizabeth recognises it as pure performance. The gap between Lady Catherine's assumed power and her actual impotence is the scene's central comedy.

Key Words

Rhetorical questionA question asked for effect, expecting no answerRhetorical dominanceControlling a conversation through language and social powerJudicial authorityThe power to make and enforce judgments
5

Context (AO3)

AO3

PEMBERLEY AS SYMBOL

Pemberley represents the ideal English estate — orderly, beautiful, and morally serious (Darcy is a good landlord). Lady Catherine's claim to protect Pemberley is ironic: by trying to prevent Darcy from marrying Elizabeth, she is actually opposing his happiness and moral growth. The true 'pollution' would be a loveless marriage arranged for class purity.

CLASS & PURITY

The language of 'pollution' connects to Regency anxieties about social contamination — the fear that mixing classes would degrade aristocratic bloodlines and culture. This anxiety underlies much of the novel's conflict: Darcy initially struggles with Elizabeth's family connections, and Miss Bingley and Lady Catherine explicitly voice the class prejudice that Darcy must overcome.

Key Words

Social contaminationThe fear that mixing social classes will degrade the higher classBloodlineA person's ancestry or family lineage
6

WOW — OTHERING & ABJECTION (Kristeva)

AO1AO2

Julia Kristeva argues that societies construct the abject (the rejected, disgusting Other) to define their own identity — 'we' are defined by what 'we' are not. Lady Catherine's use of 'polluted' performs abjection: the Bennet family is cast as the abject Other whose proximity threatens aristocratic identity. Kristeva argues that abjection always reveals more about the person who abjects than about the person abjected — Lady Catherine's disgust exposes her own fragility: her identity depends entirely on excluding others. Without someone to look down upon, her self-concept collapses.

Key Words

AbjectionThe psychological process of casting out what is considered disgusting or threateningThe OtherA person or group defined as fundamentally different from oneselfFragilityVulnerability disguised as strength; a brittle sense of self